A half-century of hatchet jobs

The cops on Australia’s culture beat

Featured in

  • Published 20250506
  • ISBN: 978-1-923213-07-4
  • Extent: 196 pp
  • Paperback, ebook, PDF

‘THIS IS A load of fucking crap’ is ‘Oz critical-speak in its purest form’, writes Angela Bennie in the swashbuckling introduction to her 2006 anthology, Crème de la Phlegm. ‘The critical sport in this country is to compose piquant variations on its theme to show that at least some intellectual effort has been made.’ Subtitled ‘Unforgettable Australian Reviews’, Bennie’s anthology is devoted to vitriolic expressions of Australian criticism, all of them published between 1956 and 2005. To classify this half-century of reviews as negative evaluations is to sanitise them. These are hatchet jobs and professional flayings. Dunks, pans, roasts, smears and skewers, puerile denunciations and all manner of righteous, poisonous, highly anxious savagery. 

Bennie borrowed that ‘load of fucking crap’ line from opera director Barrie Kosky, who was first enraged by the reluctance of Australian critics to condemn what he saw as mediocre work, and then again by the responses of those same critics to the glorious excesses of his productions. Such behaviour conforms to the general pattern observed by Gideon Haigh in his 2010 Kill Your Darlings jeremiad against the timidity and fecklessness of Australian critics: ‘Everyone is in favour of frank and fearless criticism, up to the point where a work of theirs might come off the worse for it.’ Bennie, Kosky and Haigh each convey perennial anxieties about Australian criticism: that critics are inconsistent in their application of the scalpels; that Australian audiences and artists prefer critics to confirm rather than to challenge their prejudices. We want brutal, honest critics, and we want them to tell us that the work we love is world class. This tension is, for Bennie, highly revealing.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

More from author

Pay writers like politicians

When we talk about Australian books and writers today, we often find ourselves talking about money. Like patients with chronic illness, we’ve become adept at enumerating the symptoms of our malaise. We talk about broke writers and broke publishers and broke editors. Is anyone making any money? We talk about the cost of books and the cost of paper. We talk about writers’ incomes and the salaries of publishing staff. We talk about the cost of housing and university redundancies. There simply isn’t enough grant funding to go around. We talk about who can’t afford to write. We talk about the indie publishers selling out to multinationals because the margins are too tight. We talk about the market – the market for Australian literature that’s so small, even a prize-winning bestseller doesn’t bring financial security to its author. The market can’t be trusted with our national literature – unless what we want is self-published erotic fiction, which is apparently where the money lies. We talk about the obscenity of wealthy tech corporations shitting on copyright. If tech companies won’t pay writers, who else will?

Even when we’re not talking about money – when we’re talking about our hopes for a national literature, or whose stories should be told, when we’re talking about easy reading, or books that infantilise their readers, or how to safeguard freedom of expression, or the moral principles at stake in wholesale breach of copyright – our conversations are caveated and curtailed by the money question. At our most ambitious, we talk about how to pay writers a living wage.

More from this edition

Björk in concert

FictionThe wind feels strange on his face. He hasn’t stepped outside in too long. He hesitates in the doorway. He really doesn’t have time for this. He needs to write that last chapter. He needs to finish what he has promised. What separates humans from everything else is our urge to create. He turns back towards his computer but then he is outside and locking the door and it feels like he has no agency over this. His body wants to go for a walk and so he must walk. He catches a glimpse of something bright poking up through the mulch at the base of a tree. A mushroom. Then suddenly they all come into focus. Mushrooms everywhere. Mushrooms on tree trunks like little shelves for fairy books, mushrooms in the mud and mushrooms in among the grass. There are even little net-like things around red stalks. Weird Cronenberg mushrooms, half fungus, half machine.

Trip Advisor review of a protest

Poetry Firstly, what’s with all the footwork? A downward slope would be an attribute. There’s enough gory fundamentalism without toe jam. On that note, can...

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.