Into the void

Democracy and the death of mass politics

Featured in

  • Published 20240806
  • ISBN: 978-1-922212-98-6 
  • Extent: 216pp
  • Paperback, ePUB, PDF

THERE REALLY SHOULD be a German word for it – maybe there is: when you know something should shock you, but it just doesn’t anymore. You’ve become desensitised. In politics, this feeling has become increasingly familiar. Over the past few years, all that was thought solid has melted into air – hot air in most cases. 

The first sign of serious political climate change arrived in June 2016 when a majority of Britons voted for Brexit, giving the proverbial two-fingered salute to almost the entire British political class. This was a huge surprise from which British politics is arguably yet to recover. But when later that year in the US presidential elections Donald Trump, a boorish, self-aggrandising businessman with a penchant for lying, defeated Hillary Clinton, doyenne of the American political establishment, the shockwave that rippled through newsrooms and political-science departments could have triggered seismometers. Hardly anyone predicted the outcome, but there it was. Decades of political convention were upended.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

About the author

Shahar Hameiri

Shahar Hameiri is Professor of International Politics and Australian Research Council Future Fellow in the School of Political Science and International Studies, University of...

More from this edition

Finding the right phenotype

Non-fictionAs a recently diagnosed transgender person, I was already part of a highly online, over-educated and underemployed cohort, routinely blamed for stifling free speech as well as both maintaining the gender binary and destroying it. The alt-right discourse was already aflame, decrying the social scourge of everyone wanting to be seen as a ‘special snowflake’ and the creeping ‘politics of victimhood’. Did I really need to inhabit a second suspect identity? Did I need another personal attribute I felt deeply ambivalent about to become a public part of my persona?

Joker in the pack 

IntroductionStatus itself is a little like a riddle: a code to be cracked, a hand in which you can’t see all the cards. Unless you’re Batman, however, the stakes for solving riddles tend to be comfortingly low, whereas the pressures of deciphering status can occupy a far more consequential role in our lives (it’s all fun and games until somebody loses their cultural capital).

The great divide

In ConversationIn the ’80s, and maybe the early ’90s, fashion was a political statement just like art was…and real art wasn’t about selling out or succeeding in a mainstream context; it was the opposite. The whole idea was that you didn’t want to conform. Anyone who was trying to make money off your art or helping you make money was corrupt or compromised. The last thing you did as an artist or a writer in the ’80s was self-publicise – it was so naff, it wasn’t done. Street cred was what mattered. And I’ve been watching, with social media and the internet, this 180-degree shift over the last few decades.

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.