Five million years on the right side of history

Climate justice after humans

Featured in

  • Published 20241105
  • ISBN: 978-1-923213-01-2
  • Extent: 196 pp
  • Paperback, ebook, PDF

WHEN ALIENS LOOK back on the first decades of the twenty-­first century, they might be surprised that we humans busied ourselves debating geological time while the planet cooked. Ten years after the 2000 meeting in which the Dutch atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen blurted out, ‘We’re in the…the…the Anthropocene!’, a working group was formed by the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS) that, despite being called the Anthropocene Working Group, tasked itself with bestowing a name upon our present. There were two things to ascertain: whether we were indeed part of a new geological epoch and, if we were, what initiated its onset.

In 2019, the Anthropocene Working Group submitted that the Great Acceleration of the 1950s – in which fossil-­fuel use, consumption and population increased radically – was the spike that produced our contemporary era, claiming this was most visible in the sediments of Crawford Lake, Canada. But in 2024, the SQS voted resoundingly against the submission: four in favour, twelve against and three abstentions. The working group recognised that ‘their proposal has been decisively rejected’ – but reminded readers that ‘the Anthropocene as a concept will continue to be widely used…it will remain an invaluable descriptor in human-­environment interactions’.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

More from author

Seized by a ceaseless meanwhile

Non-fictionOwing to its prominent location and spectacular collapse, Álvaro Obregón 286 featured prominently in media coverage of the earthquake rescue. But residents told me they always suspected something was afoot. Within twenty-­four hours of the disaster, rescuers from Israel and Spain arrived onsite. Both teams quickly recovered documents and computers and rescued only specific people, while others in the rubble still cried out for help.

More from this edition

Up for debate

In ConversationDebate emphasises different ideals. You are forced to argue for positions you don’t believe and, regardless of your stance, you learn always to consider the opposing perspective. That is quite literal: after preparing your case, you turn to a different sheet and write the four best arguments for the other side or mark up your argument for its flaws and inconsistencies. Paper and pen. That is countercultural at a time when we expect a tight nexus between speech and identity, and I think there is something to be gained from such role-­play.

Believe it or not

IntroductionCultural critic Chuck Klosterman reminds us that ‘any present-tense version of the world is unstable. What we currently consider to be true – both objectively and subjectively – is habitually provisional.’

The work

Fiction ‘I SAW IT on TikTok,’ my stylist, Asher, said in an undertone as her assistants trickled into the apartment with rolling racks and cases...

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.