Featured in

- Published 20250506
- ISBN: 978-1-923213-07-4
- Extent: 196 pp
- Paperback, ebook, PDF

WHENEVER I REACH for my phone – which is more often than I care to admit, although I suppose I just did – I think of that old thought experiment about the tree falling in a forest. You know the one: if there’s no one around to hear the tree, does it make a sound? A similar principle, I’ve realised, applies to my consumption of online content: if I don’t mindlessly watch those Instagram deep-dives into the duelling lawsuits between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni or the veritable parade of Easter eggs hidden in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl half-time performance…do I really care?
In a frenzy of New Year determination, I sought to resolve this vexed question by switching my smartphone for a flip-phone with limited internet access. Am I now free from the tyranny of social media and its spoils? Dear reader, I wish it were so: the flip-phone model I purchased on eBay couldn’t read my SIM card properly, but it did have 4G, the result being that I could book an Uber, check my bank balance and listen to a podcast – but I couldn’t make calls or send texts (which, arguably, offered me a different yet equally tempting kind of freedom). I’m back to using a smartphone – well, I never stopped – and marinating myself daily in a useless swill of information.
Our contemporary content malaise feels very recent, yet the twentieth-century media scholars Marshall McLuhan and Neil Postman predicted our technological capture decades before Mark Zuckerberg and his college roommates devised a neat way for their fellow Harvard students to connect online. McLuhan, of course, famously theorised that ‘the medium is the message’; in his remarkable 1992 book Technopoly, Postman – a former student of McLuhan’s – warned: ‘We proceed under the assumption that information is our friend… It is only now beginning to be understood that cultures may also suffer grievously from information glut, information without meaning, information without control mechanisms.’
Sounds familiar: it’s Postman and McLuhan’s world, and we’re all just living in it. But how much longer can we keep scrolling before we reach the end?
THIS EDITION OF Griffith Review seeks to understand the tempestuous liaison between culture and content, and its contributions, both fiction and non-fiction, approach this from myriad perspectives. You’ll parse the dissonance between our digital and corporeal selves; chart the evolution of Australia’s critical establishment in the twenty-first century; contemplate the dangers of digital celebrities; discover what we lose when we give all creative output the anodyne label of ‘content’; consider the implications of cultural heritage in our national literary tradition; explore the tension between artistic freedom and the professionalisation of creativity; examine how commercial imperatives have reshaped the publishing industry; revisit the work of a literary iconoclast; find out what kids these days are really doing online (not as outrageous as you might think); and much more. There’s a lot of information in these pages, but it all has meaning – so I like to think Postman would approve.
This edition features a contributing editor, the fabulous Beau Windon, who commissioned and worked with Alex Creece on her brilliant essay ‘It ain’t easy being twee’. Beau and Alex, thank you both for what you brought to this collection and for being so delightful to collaborate with.
Culture Vultures also includes the third of five outstanding stories to win our 2024 Emerging Voices competition: Emily Tsokos Purtill’s ‘Know thyself’, a sharply observed meditation on fate and mortality. We’re very grateful to the Copyright Agency Cultural Fund for their support of this competition, and we’re looking forward to sharing more winning stories with you later in the year.
Whether you’re reading Culture Vultures in print or online, I hope it offers you new ways of thinking through our technological capture (ideally, ways that don’t end with you being the owner of one-and-a-half phones) and determining which of those falling trees you care to hear.
– February 2025
Image courtesy of Peggy from Pixabay
Share article
More from author

The art of appropriation
I had this assignment at university when I was doing my creative arts degree. A lot of the time, art students will copy the old masters to get better at painting and fix their technique. So I thought, I’m going to give this a go and copy Botticelli’s The Birth of Venus – and while I’m at it, I’m just going to make Venus brown and make her look like someone I know. I didn’t really have words at the time to say why I was doing that – I was just drawn to it.
More from this edition

Nobody panic
Non-fictionThe desert of the real is now where most teens search for answers to life’s big questions: what is love? Who am I? What is truth? The images of reality we create hold messages about reality. Copies of copies of copies though they may be, they nonetheless have a material effect on our children’s thoughts, behaviours, opinions. Consumerism. Communism. Sexism. Cancelism. Nationalism. Anarchism. Stoicism. Humanism. Ideas about what we should live like, look like and love like, what it means to be a man or a woman, what it means to be an individual or part of a community, are all displayed on a screen in their pockets. The influence is profound, but not necessarily sinister if they are taught to interrogate what they consume.

The art of appropriation
In Conversation When Brandi Salmon taught herself to paint as a teenager in country Victoria, she never imagined she’d grow up to be a full-time visual...

Trip Advisor review of a protest
Poetry Firstly, what’s with all the footwork? A downward slope would be an attribute. There’s enough gory fundamentalism without toe jam. On that note, can...