Gay saints

Pasolini and the sanctity of cinema

Featured in

  • Published 20241105
  • ISBN: 978-1-923213-01-2
  • Extent: 196 pp
  • Paperback, ebook, PDF

FEW FIGURES EMBODY the contradictions inherent to Catholicism more explicitly than the poet, writer and film director Pier Paolo Pasolini; as Thomas Hardy observed, the greater the sinner the greater the saint. The Marxist/poet/homosexual/atheist was living proof of the efficacy of baptism: holy water does not wash off. If one is serious about emulating the life of Christ, then one has carte blanche to condemn hierarchy and hypocrisy, rail against institutional authority, and ultimately annoy the powerful so much that they order one’s death. If the example of the saints is instructive, then without meeting this last criterion one is not really trying.

In his lifetime, Pasolini managed to annoy almost everyone in postwar Italian society. A Marxist in the tradition of Antonio Gramsci, he was booted from the Italian Communist Party on charges of corrupting youths (a perfectly Catholic euphemism) and later condemned for his counter-­revolutionary depiction of the life of Christ. Near every movie he premiered was attacked by both fascists and communists, who were appalled by what they respectively perceived as the films’ corrosive immorality and unflattering depictions of the urban poor. In the same year he was convicted for blasphemy – Catholicism being the state religion of Italy until 1984 – the Church funded his 1964 adaptation of The Gospel According to St Matthew, included by the Vatican on its 1995 list of ‘Some Important Films’. He fell out and later reconciled with fellow filmmaker Federico Fellini, refused to marry the infatuated Maria Callas, and in the left-­wing student revolutions of 1968 sided with the police, declaring them the true heroes of the class war. It is not surprising that in 1975 he was horrifically murdered aged fifty-­three; the crime remains unsolved. In the tumult of the Years of Lead – the two decades of hyper-­partisan political unrest initiated by ’68 – it’s surprising no one did it sooner.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

More from author

Little gifts of flowers

It’s unclear whether Boyd, who would have been two years old when Wilde was convicted and imprisoned for gross indecency, similarly literalised his homoerotic fantasies. Contemporaneous reviews of Brenda Niall’s 1988 biography, Martin Boyd: A Life, commend Niall, in a way that reveals the soft prejudice of the times, for how she handled the subject of Boyd’s sexuality. Paraphrasing Boyd’s family friends – who referred to Boyd, endearingly, as Floppy – Niall writes that Boyd was probably ‘too fastidious for casual sex, and with too strict a sense of honour to exploit the innocent, he probably repressed and aestheticized his sexuality’. This conclusion is buttressed by the conspicuous absence of the only work in Boyd’s catalogue that presumably possessed an unambiguously homosexual point of view, of which we know little except that there were flowers.

In a way that strikes me, again, as typically Australian, Boyd is slightly behind the times with his fin de siècle attitude towards classicism and homo- sexuality. His novels are uniquely appealing to me for the narcissistic reason that they are perhaps the only Australian books I can imagine myself having written. It’s why I find the correspondence about The Shepherd of Admetus so appallingly fascinating. I’ve read countless gay novels, by gay authors, in an attempt to discover my own writing. The author to whom I feel closest, by virtue of nationality, style and subject, wrote one such novel, and for all anyone knows, it might have been rubbish.

More from this edition

Land, sea and sky

Non-fiction YOU CAN ONLY imagine what it would have been like. On 1 July 1871, the warrior chief Dabad and his men stood and watched...

Staying faithful to Earth

Non-fictionIt is a startlingly new discovery that there are more planets than stars in our galaxy. Even if early astronomers (like Kepler) intuited that other suns must have planets, we didn’t have definitive proof until very recently that our solar system is not unique in consisting of planets orbiting a star. The first exoplanet was confirmed in 1992; the first exoplanet around a star similar to our sun was discovered in 1995. The latest count is over 5,000 and growing. Discoveries have stacked up so fast that astronomers and astrophysicists who used to know each individual exoplanet by name now say it’s impossible to keep track of those that exist in just one small part of the Milky Way, with thousands more expected to be found in the coming years.

Through the looking glass

In Conversation Photography and truth have always had a complicated relationship. Long before AI and deepfakes recalibrated our trust in the medium, we’ve seen reality reinterpreted...

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.