Dominion

On the trail of Australia’s Christian far right

Featured in

  • Published 20241105
  • ISBN: 978-1-923213-01-2
  • Extent: 196 pp
  • Paperback, ebook, PDF

GILEAD MEMES, PLUCKED from the TV series The Handmaid’s Tale, have become a reactive go-­to for expressing horror and disgust at the disintegration of reproductive rights in the United States, even before Roe v Wade was revoked by the US Supreme Court on 24 June 2022. The Gilead of Margaret Atwood’s imagination, first embodied in her speculative 1985 novel, is a nightmarish vision of what a Christo-­fascist regime may look like. The startling, colour-­coded clothing to demarcate ‘types’ of women, particularly the red capes and white hoods of the handmaids, along with the horrifying state-­sanctioned violence, are what make Gilead such a powerful representation of Christo-­fascist oppression. The Handmaid’s Tale turned a largely abstract ideology – ‘Christian reconstructionism’ – into a concrete, visual ‘reality’, and therein lies its symbolic power.

The aesthetics of Hulu’s Gilead, however, also lend it an improbable, even fanciful, air. Visually, it bears too little resemblance to our current society, especially in its eschewing of social media and technology, for us to view its premise – white Christian nationalism taking over a nation’s body politic – as a genuine, real-­world ‘what if?’ Yet the threat of Christo-­fascism in the US has never been as imminent or menacing. We’ve been watching it happen for eight years: one Supreme Court appointment, one piece of legislation, one failed coup, one overturned constitutional right at a time. Where is it heading? How far will it go?

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

More from author

Scarlett fever

Non-fictionThe competition was notable for its shift away from being a Vivien Leigh lookalike contest. The bid to find a woman who, instead, ‘most closely’ resembled how Scarlett ‘would act and speak today’ and embodied ‘her spirit and sass’ opened up the search to any woman with a bit of chutzpah, including, in theory, Black and other women of colour.

More from this edition

Gay saints

Non-fictionWhat is it that makes cinema, for Pasolini, sacrosanct? The answer lies in his affinity for a painter who made only one fresco. Not only was Caravaggio’s reputation restored by Pasolini’s teacher and mentor, Roberto Longhi, but Caravaggio and Pasolini have the same taste in men. Swarthy, young and savage – as likely to sit for a portrait or engage in a bit of sloppy top as to stick a knife in your ribs. You wouldn’t want to run into his John the Baptist in a dark alley (unless maybe you would). It is not just the revolutionary psychology of Caravaggio’s painting that speaks to Pasolini but his selection of subjects – his sacralisation of the scorned, the unclean, the seething subproletariat both created and rejected by an indifferent urban landscape; Caravaggio’s ‘new kinds of people’.

Mustard seed

Non-fiction ON SABBATH MORNINGS, I fidgeted as we knelt on the speckled purple carpet. The polished wood of the pews smelt of lacquer in the thick,...

On the contrary

In Conversation Australian novelist Lexi Freiman knows how to walk a literary tightrope. Her fiction is both savagely funny and strikingly empathetic, daring to satirise the...

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.