Dominion

On the trail of Australia’s Christian far right

Featured in

  • Published 20241105
  • ISBN: 978-1-923213-01-2
  • Extent: 196 pp
  • Paperback, ebook, PDF

GILEAD MEMES, PLUCKED from the TV series The Handmaid’s Tale, have become a reactive go-­to for expressing horror and disgust at the disintegration of reproductive rights in the United States, even before Roe v Wade was revoked by the US Supreme Court on 24 June 2022. The Gilead of Margaret Atwood’s imagination, first embodied in her speculative 1985 novel, is a nightmarish vision of what a Christo-­fascist regime may look like. The startling, colour-­coded clothing to demarcate ‘types’ of women, particularly the red capes and white hoods of the handmaids, along with the horrifying state-­sanctioned violence, are what make Gilead such a powerful representation of Christo-­fascist oppression. The Handmaid’s Tale turned a largely abstract ideology – ‘Christian reconstructionism’ – into a concrete, visual ‘reality’, and therein lies its symbolic power.

The aesthetics of Hulu’s Gilead, however, also lend it an improbable, even fanciful, air. Visually, it bears too little resemblance to our current society, especially in its eschewing of social media and technology, for us to view its premise – white Christian nationalism taking over a nation’s body politic – as a genuine, real-­world ‘what if?’ Yet the threat of Christo-­fascism in the US has never been as imminent or menacing. We’ve been watching it happen for eight years: one Supreme Court appointment, one piece of legislation, one failed coup, one overturned constitutional right at a time. Where is it heading? How far will it go?

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

More from author

The McDonagh sisters

Initially, I didn’t question the generous-foreign- uncle story, and it’s the one Mandy Sayer went with in her 2022 biography, ‘Those Dashing McDonagh Sisters’. There are a few reasons, however, why the story doesn’t add up, but you have to dig into the archives to find them.

More from this edition

Up for debate

In ConversationDebate emphasises different ideals. You are forced to argue for positions you don’t believe and, regardless of your stance, you learn always to consider the opposing perspective. That is quite literal: after preparing your case, you turn to a different sheet and write the four best arguments for the other side or mark up your argument for its flaws and inconsistencies. Paper and pen. That is countercultural at a time when we expect a tight nexus between speech and identity, and I think there is something to be gained from such role-­play.

The trouble with eternity

Poetry I had a dream about the afterlife: I died quite unexpectedly Although it is, of course, to be expected, And I materialised in the middle of a...

On the contrary

In Conversation Australian novelist Lexi Freiman knows how to walk a literary tightrope. Her fiction is both savagely funny and strikingly empathetic, daring to satirise the...

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.