From anchor to weapon

The politics of nostalgia

Featured in

  • Published 20240206
  • ISBN: 978-1-922212-92-4
  • Extent: 204pp
  • Paperback, ePub, PDF, Kindle compatible

IMAGINE, FOR A moment, this scene. It happened to one of us recently as we were cleaning out a carport. Jarred (not his real name), one of our ­children, a seven-year-old boy, turned and said that seeing his old scooter – the one with gaudy plastic and three large wheels, instead of the stainless steel two-wheeled version he uses now – made him ‘nostalgic’. His word choice was striking (maybe somebody in the house had been talking about this word in preparation for an essay). On one level it was amusing: the idea that 2020 might be a golden age for which he felt homesick. Who would want to go back to that time, with all the uncertainty and pain of the pandemic? And how could someone so young be nostalgic for such a brief arc of history? 

But on reflection, Jarred used the term ‘nostalgia’ almost in its purest sense. His sad eyes and slumped posture conveyed his ache for a stage of earlier childhood that lay seemingly just beyond the horizon of memory. Some tough times at school lately may have added to his yearning for a safer past, and Jarred is given to frequent, wistful remembrances of holidays, of times with his grandparents, of ice-creams and sandcastles at the beach. But these kinds of feelings are common to humans of all ages. That late afternoon, as the sun left traces across the sky on its retreat west and the mosquitoes began to buzz and bite, Jarred’s pain of longing (algia) was stirred by the memory of a warm, golden-tinged past. His desire in that moment, which he intuitively knew to be unrealisable, was for a return home (nostos).

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

About the author

Michael L Ondaatje

Michael L Ondaatje is Head of the School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science, and Professor of History, at Griffith University. He is an...

More from this edition

Scarlett fever

Non-fictionThe competition was notable for its shift away from being a Vivien Leigh lookalike contest. The bid to find a woman who, instead, ‘most closely’ resembled how Scarlett ‘would act and speak today’ and embodied ‘her spirit and sass’ opened up the search to any woman with a bit of chutzpah, including, in theory, Black and other women of colour.

Time plays tricks

IntroductionTen years ago, the late, great cultural theorist Mark Fisher posited that our ‘montaging of earlier eras’ had reached such fever pitch that we no longer even noticed our submersion in a sea of bygones. And sitting alongside this purported cultural inertia are our increasingly divergent attitudes towards history – the far-right impulse to romanticise the past, the far-left desire to remedy its wrongs – and how they inflect our politics. 

Always was, always will be

In ConversationIf Aboriginal people are all dead, you don’t have to negotiate a treaty with us and you certainly don’t have to go around feeling guilty about stolen land and stolen wages and stolen children; the subjects of that injustice don’t exist anymore if you choose to believe that we’re dead or all assimilated, which isn’t the case. It’s a very practical kind of assimilation strategy.

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.