Feeling our way to utopia

Why sense must outweigh sensibility

Featured in

  • Published 20241105
  • ISBN: 978-1-923213-01-2
  • Extent: 196 pp
  • Paperback, ebook, PDF

JANE AUSTEN WAS just twenty-­one years old when she wrote her first novel, Sense and Sensibility. Today, we understand her works as more than domestic comedies – they’re also acute reflections on her times. By 1811, when Sense and Sensibility was published, the many radical excesses and violent upheavals of the French Revolution had revealed just how badly things go wrong in politics, society and even everyday life when self-­oriented romantic sensibility is allowed to overwhelm Enlightenment sense.

Austen’s novel considers this problem through a tale of two sisters: commonsense, upright Elinor and her younger, more passionate and imaginative sister, Marianne, who is making some poor choices in the romance department. At stake for both women are conservative interests such as security, status and duty, but also the prospect of marital trust and long-­term contentment. The novel weighs up the proper balance between head and heart, judgement and spontaneity, reason and feeling. When Marianne protests against the crude insensitivity of those around her with her own spontaneous acts of rudeness, Elinor, Jane Austen’s literary proxy, quietly steps in to restore civility. Sensibility loves drama, but sense requires negotiating an accommodation between all parties that allows their small corner of society to go on.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

About the author

Lucinda Holdforth

Lucinda Holdforth is an author and speechwriter based in Sydney. Her latest book is Twenty-­First Century Virtues: How They Are Failing our Democracy (Monash...

More from this edition

The trouble with eternity

Poetry I had a dream about the afterlife: I died quite unexpectedly Although it is, of course, to be expected, And I materialised in the middle of a...

Up for debate

In ConversationDebate emphasises different ideals. You are forced to argue for positions you don’t believe and, regardless of your stance, you learn always to consider the opposing perspective. That is quite literal: after preparing your case, you turn to a different sheet and write the four best arguments for the other side or mark up your argument for its flaws and inconsistencies. Paper and pen. That is countercultural at a time when we expect a tight nexus between speech and identity, and I think there is something to be gained from such role-­play.

On the contrary

In Conversation Australian novelist Lexi Freiman knows how to walk a literary tightrope. Her fiction is both savagely funny and strikingly empathetic, daring to satirise the...

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.