Capitalism in conference or democratic gridlock?

Featured in

  • Published 20030902
  • ISBN: 9780733313318
  • Extent: 160 pp
  • Paperback (234 x 153mm)

THE WORLD TRADE Organisation (WTO) suddenly gained notoriety in Seattle in 1999 when demonstrations against it appeared on every television screen: in the sitting rooms of the rich, the lobbies of global corporations and the crowded slums of the poor. The WTO was a dangerous political threat, the demonstrators warned: an international body that had caused social and economic ills. It became the symbol of globalisation, capitalism in conference, benefiting the rich and the powerful, exploiting poor nations and entrenching, even widening, the incidence of poverty. The dominant image was of an organisation tinged with menace, a monster to be feared and to be faced.

But that image crumbles in Geneva, the headquarters of the WTO. Instead of a powerful body with the capacity to destroy the world, the WTO is seen as more democratic than all other international organisations. Indeed, its consensus decision-making sometimes suggests it is on the verge of collapse. Gridlock is an ever-present possibility. So what is this institution? Who makes up the WTO and how real are the threats it is said to present?

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

More from author

The good old days

EssayIT’S NOT CRICKET. In the old days, sometime in the distant past, cricketers played by the spirit of the game – no sledging, no...

More from this edition

What rough beast

EssayBEN BUCKLER IS one of those secret places you can find in any large city, a space within a space, with its own microclimate...

Sorrows of empire

EssayWITH THE FALL of Baghdad, America's dutiful Anglophone allies – the British and Australians – are due for their just rewards: luncheons for Blair...

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.